Date:    Sat, 11 Sep 2004 12:25:35 -0600 
From:    romerob <romerob@TELUSPLANET.NET> 
Subject: 'the beat' of danceable music 
  
Ramiro Garcia wrote: 
  
<The crystal clock on a mobo synchronizes the disparate components so they 
can work together, despite their substantial differences in form and 
function. I believe the regular beat in strict-tempo music can perform the 
same function between two strangers at a milonga.> 
  
[.....] 
  
My 2 Canadian cents: 
  
I think the distinction between danceable or non-danceable tango music is 
not like black and white, and it is independent of the woman's skills as a 
follower.  
  
From what I have read is that ultimately social mores and lifestyles 
influence what and how we dance. The distinction between what music is 
considered danceable or non-danceable is at best referential. On the one 
hand, some early tangos by today standards would be deemed to slow, boring, 
and uninspiring for social dancing, and on the other hand the first forms of 
tangos or milongas, which preceded the early tangos were considered too 
fast, and with too many changes in rhythm and cadence. Then, these tangos or 
milongas would have been deemed too difficult to dance, not representative 
of the European immigrants' lifestyle in Buenos Aires, and therefore were 
non-danceable. 
  
Best regards, 
  
Bruno 
  
  
 
    
Continue to Feelings verses thinking |
ARTICLE INDEX 
     
 |  
 |