| 
 
 Date:    Sun, 25 Aug 2002 18:41:50 -0400
 From:    Manuel Patino <white95r@HOTMAIL.COM>
 Subject: Weenies of  tango
 
 I'm a little confused about all these topics and threads. Unfortunately, I
 delete messages frequently (have to keep the volume of messages down in my
 hotmail account) I would like to ask somebody to please tell me just who
 these weenies are, where the are and just what is their fatal flaw? I'm
 afraid I've got a lot of folks confused and I cannot tell who said what.
 
 Another question would be if there is a female equivalent of the tango
 weenie. What would her characteristics be? I guess by now some folks might
 be as confused as I am. It would seem that the ideal man of tango is
 somewhat of an amalgamation of  John Wayne and Lancelot with a dash of
 Cyrano de Bergerac (sp?). I don't think the ideal tango woman has been
 described yet. I'm curious to see what she would be like.
 
 Also, what about describing the worst tango men? And the women? What would
 their major defects be? I'm not sure the "weenie" label would be used for a
 truly "malevo" personality. The tango world of the turn of the century in Bs
 As was populated by a diverse bunch of men. many of them are described in
 literature and tango lyrics as rather mean and violent men with a penchant
 for controlling women and actually killing them for real or imagined
 transgressions. The women in the tango lyrics are likewise often described
 as capricious, gold digging and unfaithful. Are these the "real" men and
 women of tango?
 
 I also think that there must be some kind of middle ground where just
 regular folks with all their foibles and failings can fit in. About about
 just regular tango men? Is there a place in tango for a regular guy? What
 should an average tanguero or tanguera be like?  I'm doubtful that most
 women would actually search and long for an idealized perfect "tango knight
 in shining armor". I think that those are rather rare and probably hook up
 with the ideal tango women (whatever those are) out there. IMHO the best
 folks to associate with and the best to have around are down to earth,
 regular folks this works in tango or anything else.
 
 Manuel
 
 
 
 
 
Date:    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:55:19 -0400
 From:    Georgia Littleton <glit10go@HOTMAIL.COM>
 Subject: Re: Weenies of tango
 
 
 >From: Manuel Patino <white95r@HOTMAIL.COM>>Subject: [TANGO-L] Weenies of  tango
 >Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 18:41:50 -0400
 >
 >I'm a little confused about all these topics and threads.
 
 Manuel,Continue to step technique |
ARTICLE INDEX
 I enjoyed your response.  I share your confusion.  Or rather, less
 disingenuously, I think some of the objections raised on the weenie issue
 are themselves confused.
 
 I think there is a view of gender relations that has gained a certain degree
 of political correctness.  To appear to be an enlightened male requires a
 man to degrade himself.  A sensitive male is one who recognizes himself as
 the problem.
 
 I don't admire sycophantic males.  I found the essay from Modern Muse
 disgusting.  A Real Weenie is a perpetual apologist.  Above all, a person
 needs to be self-respecting.  From a strong center, a person can then
 project himself or herself into the world in a dignified manner worthy of
 that esteem.
 
 I think milongas, like any social setting, are sometimes the scenes of some
 bad behavior.  Tango has inherited certain codes of ettiquette that attempt
 to assist people in achieving mutually pleasant interaction.  Maybe some of
 those codes work.  Others might be fun simply because they are quaint.
 Still others might be moribund.
 
 People can debate the ettiquette.  Ultimately, they define ettiquette
 themselves when they make choices in their interactions.  Ettiquette is
 defined on a one-to-one basis.  I indulged some bad behavior at a milonga
 this weekend and I quickly regretted it.  It says something bad about me and
 creates a standard of etiquette whereby I allow myself to be treated that
 way.
 
 If I want to change things, I don't hold out any hope of accomplishing it by
 railing about it in a public forum.  The time when I could have changed
 something has now passed.  The occasion to make a point about ettiquette is
 to a person's face.  It's every person's own individual responsibility not
 to sanction inappropriate treatment of themselves.
 
 That's what Georgia says.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 | 
 |