Date:    Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:51 -0500 
From:    susan_munoz@SBCGLOBAL.NET 
Subject: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
Hi Everyone, 
  
I am new to this List and consider myself to be somewhere between an 
advanced beginner and intermediate level (understanding that all things 
are relative and different leaders/instructors would have differing 
opinions).  At this point in my tango journey, I'm more interested in 
technique so that I continuously improve as a follower.  I would 
appreciate your advice or help in understanding the term "intention" as 
it is used in instruction or workshops. 
  
In workshops, instructors often refer to "The Intention".... "Follow the 
Intention"....  "Lead with Intention"..... QUESTION:  From your personal 
point of view, would you please help me understand "Where does this 
'Intention' first emit from?"  In other words, where should I (the 
follower) first be physically feeling (or understanding) this intention? 
Is it from the chest, the shoulder, the leader's right arm or any of 
these depending on the style or movement?  Does it differ from Leader to 
Leader?  Or..... when the instructor says "Follow the Intention" is s/he 
merely substituting the word intention for lead. 
  
Perhaps I'm making this more complicated than necessary but I hear the 
term "intention" used often and separate enough that I'm trying to 
understand if there is, in fact, a difference between the terminology of 
"the intention" and "the lead" and if so, what is it, what does it mean, 
and how would/should I recognize it? 
  
Thank you for your help, 
  
Susan 
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:37:22 -0500 
From:    Stephen Brown <Stephen.P.Brown@DAL.FRB.ORG> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
Susan Munoz wrote: 
  
In workshops, instructors often refer to "The Intention".... "Follow the 
Intention"....  "Lead with Intention"..... QUESTION:  From your personal 
point of view, would you please help me understand "Where does this 
'Intention' first emit from?" 
  
Okay I bite: 
  
As dance, I project my intention with the movement centered in my spleen 
and projected my  chest and abdomen.  Women who generally try to stay 
between my shoulders generally can follow what I lead. 
  
I take a similar approach to teaching. 
  
--Steve 
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:51:56 GMT 
From:    michael <tangomaniac@JUNO.COM> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
Susan: 
Think of a lead as an invitation. A man opens a door for you. You can SEE his intention. However, in tango women should FEEL intention. The intention comes from the man's upper body, NOT the arms. If you feel a lead from a man's arms, he is pushing you, not leading you. 
  
The woman moves FIRST. If the man moves his feet first instead of his chest, he will walk right into the woman because the woman doesn't follow from the man's feet. 
  
Both partner's hips should be back so that their weight is on the balls of their foot. This DOES NOT mean bend at the waist so that the posterior sticks out. There is no bending forward when the hips are pulled back. 
  
Here is an exercise that will give you a better idea of what I'm describing. Assuming you go food shopping, imagine you are the leader when you push your shopping cart. How do you get the cart to move? Do you push it with your arms? If you do, your arms will hurt after a while. If you compress your knees and lean slightly forward onto the balls of your feet, the cart will move WITHOUT YOU TAKING A STEP. It's the same way in tango. The man signals his intention by moving his weight forward, sideways, or backwards and the woman steps. The man steps AFTER the woman. The man's right arm, wrapped around the woman's lower back, can feel how far she is stepping and the leader should match the size of her step. 
  
Now going slightly off on a tangent, imagine the shopping cart has broken front wheels that aren't aligned straight. One wheel goes to the left while the other goes straight. You'll feel the cart wobble because it's not going straight. Now imagine being lead by a man who isn't walking straight ahead because he's afraid of stepping on your feet. He uses his arms to push you out of his way. He steps on a diagonal not straight. 
  
If I'm not clear, come to Washington, DC. I'm going food shopping tomorrow night. You can push the cart and I'll cook for us. 
  
Michael Ditkoff 
Enjoyed dancing in San Francisco before my cruise 
  
  
I'd rather be dancing argentine tango 
  
-- susan_munoz@SBCGLOBAL.NET wrote: 
Hi Everyone, 
  
In workshops, instructors often refer to "The Intention".... "Follow the 
Intention"....  "Lead with Intention"..... QUESTION:  From your personal 
point of view, would you please help me understand "Where does this 
'Intention' first emit from?"  In other words, where should I (the 
follower) first be physically feeling (or understanding) this intention? 
Is it from the chest, the shoulder, the leader's right arm or any of 
these depending on the style or movement?  Does it differ from Leader to 
Leader?  Or..... when the instructor says "Follow the Intention" is s/he 
merely substituting the word intention for lead. 
  
Thank you for your help, 
  
Susan 
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:47:04 -0700 
From:    Razor Girl <dilettante666@YAHOO.COM> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
Hi Susan, 
  
Welcome to the list.  I like your question.  I am not 
an expert by any means but I would be happy to give 
you my take on "the intention" 
  
According to Merriam-Webster the first definition of 
the word intention is "a determination to act in a 
certain way".  I believe that when this word is used 
by tango instructors they are using it in this manner 
to describe the abstract concept of the thought that 
must arise before the body moves. 
  
For instance, if you are playing darts.  You observe 
the dart board, you take aim and then you throw the 
dart.  The aim is "the intention". 
  
Your question was: 
 > "Where does this 
> 'Intention' first emit from?" 
 It comes from the mind.  For example, say there is a 
blue dot on a white floor.  There is a man standing 
near the dot.  If he does not have any intention of 
stepping on the dot and takes a step, he might land on 
the dot, he might not.  The step he takes doesn't 
matter.  But say that his intention is to step on the 
blue dot.  He observes where it is and steps directly 
on it.  This is the concept that using "intention" to 
move describes. 
  
Now, when there are two people involved.  Say for 
instance that man has a parter, her intention is to 
step where he would like her to.  His intention is to 
have her step on the blue dot.  How will he convey 
this intention to her? That is the lead. 
  
The reason that intention is so important in tango is 
to enable the physical communication of the lead. 
Both partners must be focused on each other. The 
leader moves with the intention of moving with his 
partner, placing his partner's feet, avoiding 
collitions, interpreting the music through the 
movements.  The follower moves with the intention of 
staying connected to the leader and interpreting the 
music. 
  
That is my opinion. 
  
Hope that helps, 
Rose 
Portland, OR 
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:24:22 +0000 
From:    herve michel <herve_michel1@HOTMAIL.COM> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
The key thing about intent and intention is that agian. I go to the blind 
fold or the dot on the floor. What if the milonga is dark and lit by a lone 
candle. The dot may appear mauve or some toher colors. 
  
How do you discern intent under uncertainsties? 
  
A close embrace should stay until it is no longer needed and than it is kept 
becasue it is wanted. 
  
Herve 
  
  
  
This electronic message transmission contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named 
above.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its 
attachments and notify sender immediately.  Thank You. 
  
  
  
  
  
 >From: Razor Girl <dilettante666@YAHOO.COM> 
>Reply-To: Razor Girl <dilettante666@YAHOO.COM> 
>To: TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU 
>Subject: Re: [TANGO-L] Question about: "The Intention" 
>Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:47:04 -0700 
>MIME-Version: 1.0 
>Received: from mc1-f6.hotmail.com ([64.4.50.13]) by mc1-s3.hotmail.com with 
>Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:49:23 -0700 
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by 
>mc1-f6.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 
>15:48:49 -0700 
>Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com 
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id 
><8.00E7EFA0@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:48:48 -0400 
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 
>1.8e)          with spool id 1910 for TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Tue, 14 Sep 
>2004          18:47:35 -0400 
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail 
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 2008; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:45:54 -0400 
>(IBM          VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 
>18:45:54 EDT 
>14          Sep 2004 15:47:04 PDT 
>X-Message-Info: uAlIf6yzHjws1Uboq31rqBUEm3PEAfbLMbiggpHQals 
>In-Reply-To:  <000001c49a76$3eef8700$210110ac@SUSAN> 
>Precedence: list 
>Return-Path: owner-tango-l@MITVMA.MIT.EDU 
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2004 22:48:49.0714 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[003B9120:01C49AAD] 
> 
>Hi Susan, 
> 
>Welcome to the list.  I like your question.  I am not 
>an expert by any means but I would be happy to give 
>you my take on "the intention" 
> 
>According to Merriam-Webster the first definition of 
>the word intention is "a determination to act in a 
>certain way".  I believe that when this word is used 
>by tango instructors they are using it in this manner 
>to describe the abstract concept of the thought that 
>must arise before the body moves. 
> 
>For instance, if you are playing darts.  You observe 
>the dart board, you take aim and then you throw the 
>dart.  The aim is "the intention". 
> 
>Your question was: 
> > "Where does this 
> > 'Intention' first emit from?" 
> 
>It comes from the mind.  For example, say there is a 
>blue dot on a white floor.  There is a man standing 
>near the dot.  If he does not have any intention of 
>stepping on the dot and takes a step, he might land on 
>the dot, he might not.  The step he takes doesn't 
>matter.  But say that his intention is to step on the 
>blue dot.  He observes where it is and steps directly 
>on it.  This is the concept that using "intention" to 
>move describes. 
> 
>Now, when there are two people involved.  Say for 
>instance that man has a parter, her intention is to 
>step where he would like her to.  His intention is to 
>have her step on the blue dot.  How will he convey 
>this intention to her? That is the lead. 
> 
>The reason that intention is so important in tango is 
>to enable the physical communication of the lead. 
>Both partners must be focused on each other. The 
>leader moves with the intention of moving with his 
>partner, placing his partner's feet, avoiding 
>collitions, interpreting the music through the 
>movements.  The follower moves with the intention of 
>staying connected to the leader and interpreting the 
>music. 
> 
>That is my opinion. 
> 
>Hope that helps, 
>Rose 
>Portland, OR 
   
  
 
 
 
Date:    Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:52:47 +0900 
From:    astrid <astrid@RUBY.PLALA.OR.JP> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
I once saw Carlos Gavito at a workshop explaining this. 
He took one of the women into the dance hold, stood, and then, somehow, the 
woman took a step backwards. Gavito remained where he was, so she stopped 
moving, and he grinned into her confused face:"Hey, where are you going?" 
"Watch this again", he said. He stood, she took a step back, stopped as he 
had not moved, he grinned... 
Everyone looked kind of mystified, and he exclaimed with a grin:"Haa, 
intention !!!" 
"Watch this again !" He repeated the whole thing, exclaimed: "Ha, intention 
!!". The "intention" was a movement one could hardly see from the outside 
but the woman could feel it. Of course she had not moved on her own, he had 
stretched himself, put a spring in his body, and his chest had moved 
slightly forward, pushing the woman into her step. 
So, the woman does not really "move first", the man moves, without moving 
his feet yet. No magic to it, really, but Gavito certainly enjoyed 
everyone's bafflement at his little demonstration. 
I believe, one reason why you asked this question is, because you do not 
feel any "intention" from the man. This is not entirely your fault, he may 
really not be showing any "intention" yet, as your partner may be a beginner 
too, and it takes a while to develop this technique, together with the right 
posture. 
  
Astrid 
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:18:26 +0000 
From:    herve michel <herve_michel1@HOTMAIL.COM> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
OK Astrid. Let's say that It's a dark room and we touch each other at times 
but but always. There are a rainbow of choices ont he floor for a very 
complicated dance. Let's say that you started toghether yet apart and ended 
apart yet joined. 
  
The light is suddently switch on and off and it is a very dark milongra. How 
do you find oyur way back into each others arms. I know that the floor is a 
guide but you see but your eyes are not adjusted to the floor fully. 
  
Herve 
  
  
  
This electronic message transmission contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named 
above.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this 
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its 
attachments and notify sender immediately.  Thank You. 
  
  
  
  
  
 >From: astrid <astrid@RUBY.PLALA.OR.JP> 
>Reply-To: astrid <astrid@RUBY.PLALA.OR.JP> 
>To: TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU 
>Subject: Re: [TANGO-L] Question about: "The Intention" 
>Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 08:52:47 +0900 
>Received: from mc4-f13.hotmail.com ([65.54.190.149]) by mc4-s1.hotmail.com 
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:05:12 -0700 
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by 
>mc4-f13.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 14 Sep 2004 
>17:04:50 -0700 
>Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com 
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id 
><4.00E7F194@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:04:41 -0400 
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 
>1.8e)          with spool id 2934 for TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Tue, 14 Sep 
>2004          20:03:27 -0400 
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP@MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail 
>      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 3745; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:03:08 -0400 
>Received: from c149240.vh.plala.or.jp [210.150.149.240] by mitvma.mit.edu 
>(IBM          VM SMTP Level 430) via TCP with SMTP ; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 
>20:03:07 EDT 
>Received: from soteccomputer ([219.167.2.91]) by mps6.plala.or.jp with SMTP 
>id          <20040915000416.LGZL21924.mps6.plala.or.jp@soteccomputer> for 
>        <TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 09:04:16 +0900 
>X-Message-Info: uAlIf6yzHjxURYpvixiMHHYukwcNzNMUtu6BTc+QFGk>X-Warning: mitvma.mit.edu: Host c149240.vh.plala.or.jp claimed to be 
>    mps6.plala.or.jp 
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal 
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 
>Precedence: list 
>Return-Path: owner-tango-l@MITVMA.MIT.EDU 
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2004 00:04:50.0724 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[9ECE7640:01C49AB7] 
> 
>I once saw Carlos Gavito at a workshop explaining this. 
>He took one of the women into the dance hold, stood, and then, somehow, the 
>woman took a step backwards. Gavito remained where he was, so she stopped 
>moving, and he grinned into her confused face:"Hey, where are you going?" 
>"Watch this again", he said. He stood, she took a step back, stopped as he 
>had not moved, he grinned... 
>Everyone looked kind of mystified, and he exclaimed with a grin:"Haa, 
>intention !!!" 
>"Watch this again !" He repeated the whole thing, exclaimed: "Ha, intention 
>!!". The "intention" was a movement one could hardly see from the outside 
>but the woman could feel it. Of course she had not moved on her own, he had 
>stretched himself, put a spring in his body, and his chest had moved 
>slightly forward, pushing the woman into her step. 
>So, the woman does not really "move first", the man moves, without moving 
>his feet yet. No magic to it, really, but Gavito certainly enjoyed 
>everyone's bafflement at his little demonstration. 
>I believe, one reason why you asked this question is, because you do not 
>feel any "intention" from the man. This is not entirely your fault, he may 
>really not be showing any "intention" yet, as your partner may be a 
>beginner 
>too, and it takes a while to develop this technique, together with the 
>right 
>posture. 
> 
>Astrid 
   
  
 
 
 
Date:    Wed, 15 Sep 2004 07:09:52 +0200 
From:    Christian Lüthen <christian.luethen@GMX.NET> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
On 15 Sep 2004 at 8:52, astrid wrote: 
  
 > I once saw Carlos Gavito at a workshop explaining this. 
> [...] 
 the same happens in Tai Chi Chuan. :-) 
  
Christian 
  
christian@eTanguero.net 
https://www.eTanguero.net/ 
  
  
  
 
 
 
Date:    Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:28:12 -0500 
From:    Leonard Kunkel <image10@SWBELL.NET> 
Subject: Re: Question about: "The Intention" 
  
This question has been asked of me. And at first I did not have a ready 
answer but after reflection I have decided that intention is a 
combination of at least two aspects. 
  
To accomplish intention you have to have: 
  
1. Frame, correct and solid connection. Intention comes from the upper 
body but the parts of the upper body used may vary slightly according to 
the physical attributes of the partners, and the style of tango and also 
for the movement wishing to be accomplished. I believe the shoulders are 
the common denominator. What ever part of the upper body be it arms, 
chest, sternum, embrace that directs the signal it should be felt and 
connected into the shoulders. A clear signal or communication must be 
felt there. 
2. Confidence - The leader needs to understand clearly where he wants to 
place the follower and the experience with practice to know that his 
lead will be understood. And then he must act without hesitation at the 
right time in relation to the music. A leader cannot be tentative. 
  
There is invariably a time for me during a milonga that occurs at least 
once or maybe twice in the evening when I change my intention in the 
middle of a movement. It causes a miscue from the follower and she 
usually is quick to apologize thinking she was the one who made the 
stumble. I always tell them "no it was me. I was in the process of 
changing the signal, too late to be clear. It was my fault." 
  
Intention must first be clear in the leader's mind (whether consciously 
or subconsciously made) before it can be clear in the followers. 
  
Intention is confidence with the technique to clearly communicate what 
you desire. 
  
Thanks, 
LK 
  
  
  
 
    
Continue to tango in italy, where?? |
ARTICLE INDEX 
     
 |  
 |