Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:38:00 -0500
From: Stephen Brown <Stephen.P.Brown@DAL.FRB.ORG>
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
Imagine my surprise to see my friend Chris Nassopolous, who is an advocate
of close-embrace tango shown as an example of the V-embrace.
https://www.close-embrace.com/latenightportland101604/pages/Picture%20470.htm
My own thought is that the embrace is the living creation of the two
people dancing.
With best regards,
Stephen Brown
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:58:47 +0000
From: Oleh Kovalchuke <oleh_k@HOTMAIL.COM>
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
Stephen Brown got surprised thus:
>Imagine my surprise to see my friend Chris Nassopolous, who is an advocate
>of close-embrace tango shown as an example of the V-embrace.
>https://www.close-embrace.com/latenightportland101604/pages/Picture%20470.htm
I would rephrase "Imagine my surprise to see Chris photographed dancing in
V-frame". I was surprised too. I have seen Chris dancing and he is very good
close embrace dancer. Would your describe the frame captured in that picture
as close embrace though? Perhaps he had to adjust to the follower's
preferences as we all have to do at least for a tanda? Is it wrong to do so?
Not at all.
Cheers, Oleh K.
https://TangoSpring.com
>From: Stephen Brown <Stephen.P.Brown@DAL.FRB.ORG>
>Reply-To: Stephen.P.Brown@DAL.FRB.ORG
>To: TANGO-L@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: [TANGO-L] [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
>Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:38:00 -0500
>
>Imagine my surprise to see my friend Chris Nassopolous, who is an advocate
>of close-embrace tango shown as an example of the V-embrace.
>https://www.close-embrace.com/latenightportland101604/pages/Picture%20470.htm
>
>My own thought is that the embrace is the living creation of the two
>people dancing.
>
>With best regards,
>
>Stephen Brown
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:58:07 -0700
From: Razor Girl <dilettante666@YAHOO.COM>
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
--- Stephen Brown <Stephen.P.Brown@DAL.FRB.ORG> wrote:
> My own thought is that the embrace is the living
> creation of the two
> people dancing.
Yes Stephen!
I know we are all geeky and stuff for writing about
tango on the internet but I am totally exhausted by
this thread.
Do you people analyse this much when making love?
I think a point is being missed. Embrace is embrace.
It is a natural thing, we all know how to embrace one
another. The problems come from people attempting to
create something artificial to facilitate something
they believe will be assisted by holding one's arm a
particular angle, extending this or that muscle, blah
blah blah.
Hey people, lighten up and hug one another! Present
yourself as you would to someone you care about.
Genuinely, sincerely, and warmly.
Forget all this nipple to nipple, left nipple to
middle of chest, right side, left side, nonsense.
Just hold me like you mean it!!
*hugs*
Rose
Portland, OR
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:50:03 -0700
From: Huck Kennedy <huck@ENSMTP1.EAS.ASU.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
Stephen Brown writes:
> Imagine my surprise to see my friend Chris Nassopolous, who is an advocate
> of close-embrace tango shown as an example of the V-embrace.
>
> https://www.close-embrace.com/latenightportland101604/pages/Picture%20470.htm
SUMBUDY G1T A R0PE.
Huck
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:12:47 -0500
From: Hector <maselli@GATE.NET>
Subject: Re: [Tango-L] V-frame visiual aid
On Oct 29, 2004, at 12:11 AM, Razor Girl <dilettante666@YAHOO.COM> wrote:
>I know we are all geeky and stuff for writing about
>tango on the internet but I am totally exhausted by
>this thread.
>Do you people analyse this much when making love?
Where do you get the idea that any of these guys are capable of making love except when taking matters into their own hands?
"Close-grip" or "Fantasy grip" anyone?
Different strokes for different folks.
Continue to (fwd) Stupid remarks |
ARTICLE INDEX
|